Bulgarian Folklore
Journal of Folkloristics,
Ethnology, Anthropology and Arts
Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies
with Ethnographic Museum at BAS
Bl. 6, Acad. G. Bonchev Str.
1113 Sofia, BULGARIA
bulfolk@abv.bg
Reviewer’s report
Title of the reviewed article:
Reviewer:
Review deadline:
* Please underline the statement that corresponds entirely to your opinion of the reviewed work.
1. The paper complies with the scope of the journal Bulgarian Folklore: |
|||
fully |
to some extent |
does not |
|
|
|||
2. The paper deals with a major scientific problem: |
|||
fully |
to some extent |
does not |
|
|
|||
3. The author is well familiar with the state of art in the respective research field and the literature related: |
|||
yes |
relatively |
scarcely |
|
|
|||
4. The article has merit to the research field: |
|||
significant |
some |
no |
|
|
|||
5. The paper has merits to (You are allowed to chose more than one answer): |
|||
theory of the problems discussed |
enriches the respective research field in interpretation and new data |
presents new materials from filed research |
|
6. The author’s aims, statements and conclusion are formulated and presented in the article: |
clearly and well |
relatively well |
poorly |
|
||
7. The presentation is consistent, logical and gives good arguments in support of the thesa advocated: |
||
yes |
to some extent |
no of the above |
|
||
8. The article is comprehensible, legible and its style and language are at: |
||
high level |
relatively good level |
low level |
|
||
9. The abstract and the key words reveal truly and completely the content of article:
|
||
yes |
to some extent |
do not |
|
||
10. Comments and recommendations to be taken into account by the author: |
||
… |
||
|
||
11. You suggest that the Editorial Board should: |
||
publish the article without any changes
|
publish the article after a revision |
reject the article |
DATE: